Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Momentum Wealth Path
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-19 01:59:45
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Massachusetts couple charged with casting ballots in New Hampshire
- They came to Asheville for healing. Now, all they see is destruction.
- Opinion: One missed field goal keeps Georgia's Kirby Smart from being Ohio State's Ryan Day
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- As dockworkers walk out in massive port strike, the White House weighs in
- As dockworkers walk out in massive port strike, the White House weighs in
- Carvana stock price is up 228%, but a red flag just emerged
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- 11 workers at a Tennessee factory were swept away in Hurricane Helene flooding. Only 5 were rescued
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Ken Page, Voice of Oogie Boogie in The Nightmare Before Christmas, Dead at 70
- Early reaction to Utah Hockey Club is strong as it enters crowded Salt Lake market
- Mega Millions winning numbers for October 1 drawing: Jackpot at $93 million
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Why T.J. Holmes Credits Amy Robach’s Daughter for Their Latest Milestone
- See Travis Kelce star in Ryan Murphy's 'Grotesquerie' in new on-set photos
- Live Nation is found not liable for 3 campers’ deaths at Michigan music fest
Recommendation
McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
Harris and Biden are fanning out across the Southeast as devastation from Helene grows
Michael Jordan’s 23XI and a 2nd team sue NASCAR over revenue sharing model
Mega Millions winning numbers for October 1 drawing: Jackpot at $93 million
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Which products could be affected by a lengthy port strike? Alcohol, bananas and seafood, to name a few
Texas prison system’s staffing crisis and outdated technology endanger guards and inmates
Why NCIS Alum Pauley Perrette Doesn't Want to Return to Acting