Current:Home > MyVirginia judge to decide whether state law considers embryos as property -Momentum Wealth Path
Virginia judge to decide whether state law considers embryos as property
View
Date:2025-04-16 01:41:53
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — A trial is underway in Virginia that will determine whether state law allows frozen embryos to be considered property that can be divided up and assigned a monetary value.
Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Dontae Bugg heard arguments Thursday from a divorced couple who disagree over the ex-wife’s desire to use two embryos that they created when they were married.
Honeyhline Heidemann says the embryos are her last chance to conceive a biological child after a cancer treatment left her infertile. Jason Heidemann, says he does not want to be forced to become a biological father to another child.
The case attracted national attention last year when a different judge, Richard Gardiner, ruled that embryos could be considered “goods or chattel” that could be divided under state law, and his analysis relied in part on a 19th-century law governing the treatment of slaves.
Gardiner is no longer assigned to the case, for reasons unrelated to his citation of slavery as a precedent.
The case also comes as reproductive rights activists have expressed alarm over a ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court that found embryos could be considered children under that state’s law.
There is little case law in Virginia governing the treatment of embryos.
Honeyhline Heidemann’s suit was brought under a partition statute that governs the division of property between interested parties.
Jason Heidemann’s lawyer, Carrie Patterson, argued that there is no precedent for it because that law is not designed to deal with embryos. Its primary purpose, she said, is to govern the division of real estate.
Case law that exists nationally regarding embryos recognizes that they are not mere property, she said, but rather property with special characteristics that require courts to balance competing interests.
One of the things a judge must consider when evaluating such cases is a person’s “right to procreational autonomy.” In this case, Patterson said, her client has a strong interest in avoiding procreating against his will.
Honeyhline’s Heidemann’s attorney, Jason Zellman, argued that the partition statute applies if the embryos are classified as property, and if they can be assigned a monetary value.
Documents that both Heidemanns signed with the IVF provider specifically refer to the embryos as property, he said, and thus their value can be assessed as the cost incurred in their creation.
Because there are two embryos, he added, the judge has an easy means of dividing up the property: Award one embryo to each party.
Bugg, who said he will issue a ruling at a later date, expressed misgivings about the notion of assigning a monetary value to the embryos.
Zellman acknowledged that the case presents some novel issues, but he also suggested to the judge that it doesn’t need to “blaze the headlines” or establish any sweeping precedent. He said the unique facts of the Heidemanns’ case — including language in their divorce settlement requiring the embryos to remain in storage “pending a court order” — will distinguish it from future disputes.
The judge readily accepted that notion, saying, “I don’t think anything I do in this case applies to anyone but the Heidemanns.”
veryGood! (16149)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- In His First Year as Governor, Josh Shapiro Forged Alliances With the Natural Gas Industry, Angering Environmentalists Who Once Supported Him
- Teen worker raped by McDonald's manager receives $4.4 million in settlement: Reports
- 'Mass chaos': 2 shot, including teen, after suspect opens fire inside Indiana gym
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Andy Reid vs. Kyle Shanahan: Head coach rematch is fourth in Super Bowl history
- Latest rumors surrounding MLB free agents Snell, Bellinger after Kershaw re-signing
- Illinois man receives sentence after driving into abortion clinic, trying to set it on fire
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Jon Stewart returning to 'The Daily Show': Release date, time, where to watch on TV and streaming
Ranking
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Black churches, home for prayer and politics alike, get major preservation funds
- Does the hurricane scale need a Category 6? New climate study found 5 recent storms have met the threshold.
- Jam Master Jay’s business partner says he grabbed a gun and sought whoever had killed the rap star
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Penn Museum buried remains of 19 Black Philadelphians. But a dispute is still swirling.
- Jon Stewart returning to 'The Daily Show': Release date, time, where to watch on TV and streaming
- NBA trade deadline tracker: Everything to know on latest trades, deals as deadline looms
Recommendation
Average rate on 30
Jussie Smollett asks Illinois high court to hear appeal of convictions for lying about hate crime
Cough? Sore throat? More schools suggest mildly sick kids attend anyway
Mariah Carey returning to Las Vegas for Celebration of Mimi shows: All the details
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Jose Altuve signs five-year, $125 million contract extension with Houston Astros
Deputies fatally shoot machete-wielding man inside California supermarket
Jon Stewart returning to 'The Daily Show': Release date, time, where to watch on TV and streaming